
NCLAT: IBC's 'Clean Slate' Immunity Applies Only After Resolution Plan Approval
The NCLAT has ruled that the immunity under Section 32A of the IBC protects only the successful resolution applicant after the plan is approved, not buyers of assets during insolvency.
Facts
This case before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) centered on the timing and application of a key protection for buyers of distressed companies. The question was whether the legal shield provided by Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), which protects a new owner from the prior owner's criminal liabilities, applies to someone who purchases assets during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), or if it is reserved for the entity that takes over the company after a Resolution Plan is officially approved.
Holding
The NCLAT held that the “clean slate” immunity from prior offences granted under Section 32A IBC is available only to the successful Resolution Applicant after their Resolution Plan has been approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT). The protection does not extend to acquirers of land or other assets sold during the ongoing CIRP before a final plan is approved.
Reasoning
The Tribunal’s decision is based on a strict interpretation of the law. Section 32A explicitly links the cessation of liability to the approval of a resolution plan. The legislative intent behind this provision was to provide a powerful incentive for a new promoter to revive an entire distressed company. This 'clean slate' ensures the new management is not burdened by the past wrongdoings of the old one. Granting this same immunity for piecemeal asset sales during the CIRP would dilute this incentive and could complicate the overall resolution process. The immunity is a reward for the final, successful applicant who commits to reviving the company as a whole.
Practical Impact
For investors and real estate buyers, this is a crucial distinction. If you purchase land or a building from a company that is currently in CIRP but before a final Resolution Plan is approved, you do not get the benefit of Section 32A protection. This means you could potentially face claims or investigations related to the property's history under the previous owner. The powerful legal shield against past offences is exclusively for the party whose resolution plan is ultimately approved, ensuring they inherit a truly clean asset.
Sources
- NCLAT CA(AT)Ins 412/2025
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 32A
AI-drafted summary, editorially reviewed. Not legal advice. For specific queries, request a consultation.
Discussion
0 comments
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading comments…